Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 October 20243346935

Blounce Cottage Blounce, South Warnborough, Hook, Hampshire, RG29 1RX

Planning appeal 3346935 at Blounce Cottage Blounce, South Warnborough, Hook, Hampshire, RG29 1RX (Hart District Council) was dismissed on 8 October 2024 by Inspector Bristow T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether proposed works would preserve Blounce Cottage, its setting, or any features of special architectural or historic interest it possesses.

described in the application form as: ‘2 No single storey black crittell orangery extensions to the rear elevation of Blounce Cottage. All original features to the rear extension of the listed cottage are to be retained and protected.’

Authority
Hart District Council
Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Bristow T
Postcode
RG29 1RX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether proposed works would preserve Blounce Cottage, its setting, or any features of special architectural or historic interest it possesses

What decided it

The cumulative effect of the proposed orangeries would further erode the special interest and significance of the listed building by obscuring its historic form, disproportionately increasing modern floor area relative to historic fabric, and further enclosing the historic core, without clear and convincing public benefits to justify this harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
NBE8NBE9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 195Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

8 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Hart

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed8 October 20266011669
    Cedars House, Thackhams Lane, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8JG
  2. Dismissed8 September 20266005123
    Parpan, Eversley Centre, Eversley, Hook, RG27 0NJ
  3. Allowed7 September 20266011109
    16 Cricket Green, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8PP
  4. Dismissed3 September 20266004528
    Malthouse Mews, Brew House Lane, Hartley Wintney, RG27 8QA
  5. Allowed1 September 20266011801
    Esso Petrol Station, Hook Road, North Warnborough, RG29 1EU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.