Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed14 February 20253347424

Land off Chapel Lane, Great Barr, Walsall, WS9 0QU

the construction of a temporary 49.35MW battery energy storage facility, with security fencing, access and associated works. This

Authority
Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
other · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
utilities-energy · Unknown
Inspector
Baird G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect on openness
  • the effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect on heritage assets
  • the effect on the living conditions of residents with particular reference to noise
  • the effect on the supply of agricultural land
  • whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The significant public benefits of the battery storage facility—particularly its contribution to climate change mitigation and energy security, the absence of alternative sites, and biodiversity net gain—clearly outweighed the limited landscape, heritage and noise harms, whether or not the development was found to be inappropriate in the Green Belt.

Great weight to climate change mitigation/energy security, significant weight to the absence of alternative sites and permanent biodiversity net gain, and limited weight to economic benefits outweighed (and, in the alternative Green Belt scenario, clearly outweighed) the temporary Moderate/Minor adverse landscape and visual effects, the low-level less than substantial harm to heritage assets, and the limited harm to residential amenity from noise.

Framework references: 110, 115, 142, 143, 153, 154, 155, 161, 187, 188, 198, 202, 212, 215

Plan policies cited: WSAD Policy GB1, BCCS Policy ENV7, UDP Policy ENV38, UDP Policy ENV27, UDP Policy ENV30, UDP Policy ENV32, BCCS Policy CSP3, BCCS Policy EN5, WSAD Policy EN7, UDP Policy GP2, UDP Policy ENV10, UDP Policy ENV6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.