Planning appeal decision
Land off Chapel Lane, Great Barr, Walsall, WS9 0QU
Planning appeal 3347424 at Land off Chapel Lane, Great Barr, Walsall, WS9 0QU (Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed on 14 February 2025 by Inspector Baird G, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the construction of a temporary 49.35MW battery energy storage facility, with security fencing, access and associated works. This
- Authority
- Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- utilities-energy · Unknown
- Inspector
- Baird G
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect on openness
- the effect on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect on heritage assets
- the effect on the living conditions of residents with particular reference to noise
- the effect on the supply of agricultural land
- whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The significant public benefits of the battery storage facility—particularly its contribution to climate change mitigation and energy security, the absence of alternative sites, and biodiversity net gain—clearly outweighed the limited landscape, heritage and noise harms, whether or not the development was found to be inappropriate in the Green Belt.
Great weight to climate change mitigation/energy security, significant weight to the absence of alternative sites and permanent biodiversity net gain, and limited weight to economic benefits outweighed (and, in the alternative Green Belt scenario, clearly outweighed) the temporary Moderate/Minor adverse landscape and visual effects, the low-level less than substantial harm to heritage assets, and the limited harm to residential amenity from noise.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- WSAD Policy GB1BCCS Policy ENV7UDP Policy ENV38UDP Policy ENV27UDP Policy ENV30UDP Policy ENV32BCCS Policy CSP3BCCS Policy EN5WSAD Policy EN7UDP Policy GP2UDP Policy ENV10UDP Policy ENV6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 161Paragraph 187Paragraph 188Paragraph 198Paragraph 202Paragraph 212Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Walsall
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed15 October 20266008716Rooftop Food Court, Multi-Storey Car Park, George St, Walsall, Ws1 1RS
- Dismissed9 October 20266012207Land at Barr Lakes Lane, Walsall, WS5 3RB
- Dismissed11 August 20266008451251 Aldridge Road, Streetly, Walsall, B74 2DX
- Dismissed2 April 20266002505Energy Health & Fitness 9-10A the Birdge, Walsall, WS1 1LR
- Allowed31 March 20266001998Land Adjacent to Six Towers Road, Walsall, WS2 8XA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®