Planning appeal decision
Land to Rear of Greenland Cottage, High Hoyland Lane, High Hoyland, Barnsley, S75 4AZ
Planning appeal 3347461 at Land to Rear of Greenland Cottage, High Hoyland Lane, High Hoyland, Barnsley, S75 4AZ (Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 21 February 2025 by Inspector Hobbs J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the effect of the proposal on trees.
Full Planning Permission of the Erection of 1 no. Self-Build Residential Dwelling
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Hobbs J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the effect of the proposal on trees
- whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for residential development having regard to local and national planning policy and the accessibility of services and facilities
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to local and national planning policy
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The significant weight attributed to the harm to the character and appearance of the area (poor design and pressure on a retained tree) was found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the scheme.
the adverse impacts on the character and appearance of the area significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits (including housing delivery, self-build provision and sustainability), so the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply and the proposal conflicted with the development plan as a whole
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D1Policy BIO1Policy T3Policy LG2Policy GB1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 110Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 232Paragraph 57
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin); Lee Valley Regional Park Authority, R (on the application of) v Epping Forest District Council & Anor (Rev 1) [2016] EWCA Civ 404
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Barnsley
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed25 February 2026337243881 Swallow Hill Road, Low Barugh, Barnsley, South Yorkshire, S75 1LY
- Dismissed22 January 20263370772264 Dodworth Road, Barnsley, South Yorkshire, S70 6PN
- Dismissed10 October 20253369722Stancliffe Farm House, Woodhead Rad, Wortley, South Yorkshire, S35 7DA
- Notice varied and upheld14 July 20253327125Land on the East Side of Haigh Lane, Holyandswaine, S36 7JQ
- Allowed2 July 20253355889Worsbrough Equestrian, Worsbrough Road, Worsbrough, Barnsley, S70 5LN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®