Planning appeal decision
Land at Pennpark, Modbury , PL21 0TB
Planning appeal 3347514 at Land at Pennpark, Modbury , PL21 0TB (South Hams District Council) was dismissed on 29 January 2025 by Inspector Rennie S, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether pedestrian access to and from the site from the centre of Modbury is sufficiently safe with adequate footways for all users.
the demolition of existing buildings and a residential redevelopment of up to 40 dwellings, including the formation of access and associated works
- Authority
- South Hams District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Rennie S
- Postcode
- PL21 0TB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether pedestrian access to and from the site from the centre of Modbury is sufficiently safe with adequate footways for all users.
- Whether the quantum of affordable housing is sufficient and appropriate when considering site viability, which would contribute towards a suitable, inclusive and mixed rural community.
What decided it
The unacceptable risk to pedestrian/highway safety arising from the likely use of the unsafe Route 1 along the A379 outweighed the benefits of the scheme.
The harm from the unacceptable pedestrian/highway safety risk significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing and other associated benefits, tipping the balance against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy TTV 24Policy SPT2Policy TTV2Policy DEV29Policy DEV8Policy DEV9Policy DEL1Policy MNP3Policy MNP5Policy MNP6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 58Paragraph 59Paragraph 11Paragraph 115Paragraph 116
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Hams
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed27 October 20266014394Baidland, Downs Road, Thurlestone, TQ7 3NF
- Dismissed22 October 20266013915East View, Crescent Road, Ivybridge, PL21 0BP
- Allowed13 October 20266009730Airwaves Solutions Limited, DAC157, Communication Station, Road From Bolberry to Waterfern, Bolberry, TQ7 3DY
- Allowed13 October 20266009219Land at Chipple Park, Lutton, Ivybridge, PL21 9TA
- Dismissed7 October 20266006171Hazel Paddock, Land At Sx 774 389, East Portlemouth, Salcombe, TQ8 8PA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®