Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 February 20253347516

Rear of 229 and 231 Croydon Road, CATERHAM, CR3 6PG

demolition of existing side extension to no 229 and construction of 4 new dwellings comprising of 2 x 3 storey 4 bedroom dwellings and 2 x 2 storey 3 bedroom dwellings together with parking spaces, amenity space and bins and bike areas

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Miles H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including with respect to trees
  • the living conditions of existing occupiers with particular regard to noise, disturbance and parking
  • the quality of living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to privacy and outdoor space
  • highway safety

What decided it

The substantial harm to character and appearance, inadequate living conditions for existing and future occupiers, and failure to secure a well-designed place would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the moderate benefits of housing delivery, even with the tilted balance engaged.

The moderate benefits of four new dwellings in a sustainable location and contribution to housing supply were substantially outweighed by the substantial harm to character and appearance, inadequate amenity for existing and future occupiers, and failure to secure well-designed places and efficient use of land.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: CSP18, DP7, DP8, CCW4, CCW5, CSP3, CSP12, DP5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.