Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 December 20243347529

Land South of Leighton Road, Stanbridge, Bedfordshire, LU7 9HW

Planning appeal 3347529 at Land South of Leighton Road, Stanbridge, Bedfordshire, LU7 9HW (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 24 December 2024 by Inspector Owen A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of the Green Belt.

demolition of existing building(s) and development of an Integrated Retirement Community (IRC) totalling 99 extra care housing units (Use Class C2); development of 43 affordable dwellings (30% of qualifying development); and development of a 66-bed Care Home (Use Class C2), with ancillary amenity, landscaping and green space areas, access provision, car parking and service areas and internal footpath/movement network and drainage

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Owen A
Postcode
LU7 9HW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the development is suitably located with regard to its accessibility to services and facilities
  • would the harms to the Green Belt, and any other harms, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The other considerations, including housing and care need benefits, did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt, so very special circumstances were not demonstrated.

the benefits of extra care and care home provision, affordable housing, economic benefits and biodiversity net gain did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt and considerable harm to character and appearance, so the balance tipped against the development

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SP4EE5HQ1SP7H3H4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 11Paragraph 156Paragraph 157

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

33 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Central Bedfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed15 September 20266007334
    Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
  2. Allowed4 September 20266007202
    2 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
  3. Dismissed7 August 20266007254
    Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
  4. Dismissed10 July 20266005439
    263 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, LU3 3PP
  5. Dismissed8 July 20266007697
    142 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, Luton, LU3 3PS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.