Planning appeal decision
Land at Grove End, Bagshot, GU19 5HY
Planning appeal 3347530 at Land at Grove End, Bagshot, GU19 5HY (Surrey Heath Borough Council) was allowed on 12 March 2025 by Inspector Nicholls H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the scheme amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
development of up to 135 homes, including a minimum 50% affordable homes, with associated landscaping, parking, open space, play areas, etc.; the construction of a new vehicular access on to Grove End serving the proposed new dwellings; configuration of the existing vehicular access serving the Windlesham Golf Club; and all other associated development works (access only detailed matter with all other matters reserved)
- Authority
- Surrey Heath Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Nicholls H
- Postcode
- GU19 5HY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the scheme amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effects of the proposal on the landscape character and visual amenities of the area
- if relevant, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The significant shortfall in housing land supply engaged the presumption in favour of sustainable development, and the substantial benefits of housing delivery (including affordable housing) were not significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the landscape and visual harm.
The significant weight attached to conflict with the development plan through landscape and visual harm was outweighed by the substantial weight given to housing delivery amid a significant shortfall, together with affordable housing, open space, highway and ecological benefits, such that the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits and permission was granted despite conflict with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1Policy CP1Policy CP2Policy DM9Policy CP5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 58Paragraph 143Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Surrey Heath Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed18 September 202660121062 Killy Hill, Chobham, GU24 8RF
- Dismissed1 July 20266003913Wilds, The Folly, Lightwater, GU18 5XA
- Allowed21 May 20266002295Land At Snows Ride, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6LA
- Dismissed1 May 20263376162Langshot Equestrian Centre, Gracious Pond Road, Chobham, Woking, GU24 8HJ
- Allowed17 April 20263374712Newlyn, Highams Lane, Chobham, Surrey, GU24 8TD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®