Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 July 20253347575

Brockwell (Paddock And Stable), Andwell Lane, Andwell, RG24 7BB

Planning appeal 3347575 at Brockwell (Paddock And Stable), Andwell Lane, Andwell, RG24 7BB (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was dismissed on 15 July 2025 by Inspector Barton P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to local and national policy.

erection of three dwellings and provision of landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Barton P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to local and national policy
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the scheme provides for an appropriate housing mix

What decided it

The site's isolated location and the unacceptable effect on character and appearance, when weighed against the moderate benefits of housing delivery in a context of housing land supply shortfall, resulted in adverse impacts that significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.

The moderate benefits of delivering 3 family-sized dwellings and associated social and economic benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant weight given to the conflicts with development plan policies requiring sustainable locations and sympathetic character, and the long-lasting unacceptable effects on character and appearance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SS1Policy SS6Policy EM1Policy EM10Policy CN3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 61Paragraph 73Paragraph 83Paragraph 84Paragraph 135
Judgments
Braintree DC v SSCLG, Greyread Ltd & Granville Developments Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 610; City and Country Bramshill Ltd v SSHLG and others [2021] EWCA Civ 320

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

17 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266011048
    Purdues Farm, Mortimer Lane, Fair Oak Green, Stratfield Saye, RG7 2DL
  2. Allowed26 October 20266007550
    75 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266011464
    Old Kiln House, Silchester Road, Tadley, RG263PX
  4. Dismissed13 October 20266011822
    Spindles, Winchester Road, Burghclere, RG20 9DX
  5. Dismissed13 October 20266011099
    Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, RG26 5DL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.