Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 December 20243347819

830 Chester Road, Walsall, WS9 0LS

Planning appeal 3347819 at 830 Chester Road, Walsall, WS9 0LS (Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 27 December 2024 by Inspector Plenty B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

Retrospective application for a first-floor side extension

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Plenty B
Postcode
WS9 0LS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed extension on the character and appearance of the area
  • if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances to justify it

What decided it

The disproportionate increase in floorspace (49%) combined with moderate harm to Green Belt openness was not outweighed by any other considerations, and very special circumstances were not demonstrated.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GB2Policy CSP2Policy CSP4Policy ENV2Policy GP2Policy ENV32
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 142Paragraph 153

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

17 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Walsall

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed9 October 20266012207
    Land at Barr Lakes Lane, Walsall, WS5 3RB
  2. Dismissed11 August 20266008451
    251 Aldridge Road, Streetly, Walsall, B74 2DX
  3. Notice varied and upheld20 February 20263344208
    National Car Hub, Land Situated to the South and East of Back Lane, Aldridge, Walsall, WS9 0LS
  4. Allowed9 December 20253334991
    Paddock Land Corner Of Beacon Road, Bridle Lane, Walsall, Streetly, WS9 0RG
  5. Allowed9 May 20253358297
    197 Aldridge Road, Streetly, Sutton Coldfield, B74 3YR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.