Planning appeal decision
Rivington, Maddocks Hill, Norley, Frodsham, WA6 8JT
the addition of first floor, along with new external doors and windows
- Authority
- Cheshire West and Chester
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Watson S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building and its surroundings
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to privacy
What decided it
The proposal would not be a disproportionate addition to the existing building and would not be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, thereby satisfying the key policy test.
Framework references: 153, 154
Plan policies cited: Policy DM21, Policy Strat 9
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®