Planning appeal decision
Riverdale Paddock, Capel Road, Rusper, RH12 4PZ
Planning appeal 3347869 at Riverdale Paddock, Capel Road, Rusper, RH12 4PZ (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 20 November 2025 by Inspector Freer P, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development, if any, on the character and appearance of the area.
Appeal A: variation of Condition 8 of permission MO/2017/0803 to allow a single day room instead of four smaller day rooms, with associated changes to the utility building and access; Appeal B: siting of 12 additional static caravans (making a total of 20) at an existing Gypsy and Traveller caravan site, including a day room (part retrospective).
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Freer P
- Postcode
- RH12 4PZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development, if any, on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The significant and intrinsic harm to the character and appearance of the rural area caused by the day room and, in Appeal B, the urbanising effect of 20 static caravans, outweighed the benefits and shortfall in Gypsy and Traveller pitch supply.
The shortfall in five-year Gypsy and Traveller pitch supply, lack of alternative sites, and the best interests of resident children were outweighed by the significant harm to the character and appearance of the countryside, so permission was refused for both appeals.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN2Policy EN4Policy EN8Policy H5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 61Paragraph 75Paragraph 96Paragraph 98Paragraph 110Paragraph 124Paragraph 131Paragraph 135Paragraph 187
- Judgments
- the High Court Judgement on Cidermill Hatch
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 October 20266010634The Garden House, School Lane, Mickleham, Dorking, RH5 6EW
- Dismissed27 October 202660036941 Ivy House Cottages, Partridge Lane, Newdigate, RH5 5BU
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 October 20266010203High Bank,, Mill Hill Lane, Betchworth, RH3 7LS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®