Planning appeal decision
Velindre, 48 Galsworthy Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT2 7BS
Planning appeal 3347888 at Velindre, 48 Galsworthy Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT2 7BS (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was allowed on 9 December 2024 by Inspector Woodwards O, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposed loss of family-sized accommodation is acceptable, having regard to local and national planning policy.
demolition of existing 2-storey house, and erection of 7x shared living flats with a total of 49 bedrooms in two separate blocks with associated external communal amenity space, landscaping, and bin and cycle stores
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Woodwards O
- Postcode
- KT2 7BS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposed loss of family-sized accommodation is acceptable, having regard to local and national planning policy
- whether or not the proposal complies with Policy H16 of the LP, including consideration of the applicability of the policy
- whether or not the proposal makes adequate provision for affordable housing
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the effect on the significance of the ASC, and on trees
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, in regard to overlooking and sense of enclosure
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety and the efficient operation of the highway network in the vicinity of the appeal site, with particular regard to on-street car parking
- whether or not the proposal achieves acceptable levels of fire safety, having regard to local and national planning policy
What decided it
The benefits of new housing delivery, economic activity and biodiversity/greening enhancements substantially outweighed the moderate conflict with policies protecting family housing and large gardens, leading to overall compliance with the development plan as a whole.
The many and weighty benefits (housing provision, economic factors, biodiversity and ecological enhancements) outweighed the moderate harm from conflict with policies restricting loss of family housing and large gardens, so the proposal complies with the development plan as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy H16Policy DM14Policy MC1Policy CS8Policy DM10Policy DM12Policy D3Policy D12Policy G5Policy T5Policy DM9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 115Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed7 October 2026601191211 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
- Dismissed29 September 2026600998856 Burlington Road, New Malden, KT3 4NU
- Dismissed25 September 2026600907674 - 76 Coombe Road, New Malden, KT3 4QU
- Allowed11 August 20266010924271 Malden Road, New Malden, KT3 6AH
- Dismissed3 August 20266007703Town End Pier, 68 High Street, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 1HN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®