Planning appeal decision
Milford House Penshurst Road, Speldhurst, Tunbridge Wells, TN3 0PH
Planning appeal 3347954 at Milford House Penshurst Road, Speldhurst, Tunbridge Wells, TN3 0PH (Tunbridge Wells Borough Council) was dismissed on 2 June 2025 by Inspector Knight A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
erection of an eco-friendly 4 bed dwelling within the existing curtilage of the property set in an ecologically designed landscape
- Authority
- Tunbridge Wells Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Knight A
- Postcode
- TN3 0PH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including the High Weald National Landscape
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause substantial harm to openness and would fail to conserve or enhance the natural beauty of the High Weald National Landscape, and the material considerations do not comprise very special circumstances sufficient to justify approval.
The substantial weight given to the harm by reason of inappropriateness and the significant harm to openness and the National Landscape was not outweighed by the modest contribution to housing supply, the proximity to the settlement boundary, or the claimed design and sustainability benefits, which are largely policy expectations rather than additional benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Policy 2Core Policy 4Core Policy 14Policy MGB1Policy LBD1Policy EN1Policy EN25
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 85Paragraph 149Paragraph 153Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tunbridge Wells
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed10 July 20266007577The Mill House, Powder Mill Lane, Tunbridge Wells, TN4 9EG
- Dismissed30 July 202533637026 Woodside Close, Pembury, Tunbridge Wells, TN2 4BQ
- Dismissed15 July 20253352738Beacon Hotel, Tea Garden Lane, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN3 9JH
- Dismissed2 July 20253361716The Meadows, Pastheap Farm Hastings Road, Pembury, Tunbridge Wells, TN2 4BL
- Dismissed27 May 20253349615High View Langton Road, Langton Green, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN3 0BB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®