Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 July 20253361716

The Meadows, Pastheap Farm Hastings Road, Pembury, Tunbridge Wells, TN2 4BL

Planning appeal 3361716 at The Meadows, Pastheap Farm Hastings Road, Pembury, Tunbridge Wells, TN2 4BL (Tunbridge Wells Borough Council) was dismissed on 2 July 2025 by Inspector Murray D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal constitutes 'inappropriate development' in the Green Belt and the effect on its openness or falls within the scope of 'grey belt' as defined in the National Planning Policy Framework.

the change of use and the stationing of 12 mobile homes, 5 touring caravans, 1 portacabin for residential use, 3 containers, 1 static caravan for storage, and septic tank

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Murray D
Postcode
TN2 4BL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal constitutes 'inappropriate development' in the Green Belt and the effect on its openness or falls within the scope of 'grey belt' as defined in the National Planning Policy Framework
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area and whether the proposal would conserve and enhance the landscape and scenic beauty of the High Weald National Landscape
  • Whether the scale of the development proposed would dominate the nearest settled community
  • The effect on biodiversity including protected species
  • Whether the living conditions of the occupiers of the residential mobile homes/caravans would be subject to excessive noise and poor air quality from traffic on the A21
  • Whether the development would make proper arrangements for the disposal of surface water run-off or increase the risk of flooding elsewhere
  • The effect on the setting and significance of the non-designated heritage assets of Pastheap Farm and Pastheap Oast
  • Whether the Council can demonstrate a five-year supply of Gypsy and Traveller pitches
  • The appellant's and other families' personal circumstances
  • Whether other considerations clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and any other harm so as to amount to very special circumstances

What decided it

The location of the site is inherently unsuitable because of the effect on the Green Belt, the sensitive landscape of the High Weald National Landscape, and the close proximity to traffic noise and pollution on the A21, which greatly outweigh the personal circumstances and unmet need for Gypsy and Traveller pitches.

The significant weight given to the lack of Gypsy and Traveller sites and the personal circumstances of the residents was outweighed by the substantial harm to the Green Belt, the great weight due to harm to the High Weald National Landscape, the undemonstrated suitable living conditions due to noise and air quality, the unassessed heritage harm, and the lack of proper ecological assessment, such that very special circumstances do not arise.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H4Core Policy 4Policy C3Policy MGB1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 28Paragraph 54Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 135Paragraph 153Paragraph 155Paragraph 187Paragraph 189Paragraph 193Paragraph 199Paragraph 207Paragraph 215Paragraph 216

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

17 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tunbridge Wells

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed10 July 20266007577
    The Mill House, Powder Mill Lane, Tunbridge Wells, TN4 9EG
  2. Allowed19 December 20253366410
    Uphill, New Pond Road, Benenden, Cranbrook, Kent, TN17 4EJ
  3. Dismissed30 July 20253363702
    6 Woodside Close, Pembury, Tunbridge Wells, TN2 4BQ
  4. Dismissed15 July 20253352738
    Beacon Hotel, Tea Garden Lane, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN3 9JH
  5. Dismissed2 June 20253347954
    Milford House Penshurst Road, Speldhurst, Tunbridge Wells, TN3 0PH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.