Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 February 20253347994

21 St.Thomas Street, Oxford , OX1 1JJ

Planning appeal 3347994 at 21 St.Thomas Street, Oxford , OX1 1JJ (Oxford City Council) was dismissed on 5 February 2025 by Inspector Thandi B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the host property and area including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Central (City & University) Conservation Area.

two-storey rear extension to existing property

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Thandi B
Postcode
OX1 1JJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the host property and area including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Central (City & University) Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of the occupiers of 22 St Thomas Street with regard to daylight, sunlight and outlook
  • Whether the proposal would provide adequate amenity space for occupiers of the host property

What decided it

The proposed extension's disproportionate scale, mass and design would cause less than substantial but considerable harm to the conservation area's character and appearance, and would unacceptably harm the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through loss of light and outlook, which together outweighed the public benefits of the scheme.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DH1DH3H14RE7H16
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

127 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Oxford City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed9 October 20266012854
    100 Kingston Road, Oxford, OX2 6RN
  2. Allowed7 October 20266013373
    27 Norham Road, Oxford, OX2 6SQ
  3. Dismissed2 October 20266013769
    56 St Giles, Oxford, OX1 3LU
  4. Allowed25 September 20266011486
    41 Hayfield Road, Oxford, OX2 6TX
  5. Allowed25 September 20266005861
    14A Benson Road, Oxford, OX3 7EH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.