Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed31 December 20243348033

Ashwood Barn, Shay Lane, Kelsall, Cheshire, CW6 0UT

Planning appeal 3348033 at Ashwood Barn, Shay Lane, Kelsall, Cheshire, CW6 0UT (Cheshire West and Chester) was allowed on 31 December 2024 by Inspector Watson S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

access track and turning area for shed, plus minor design alterations

Authority
Cheshire West and Chester
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Watson S
Postcode
CW6 0UT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area

What decided it

The track and turning area, as engineering operations, preserve the openness of the Green Belt and do not conflict with its purposes, while the barn alterations and overall development respect the rural agricultural character of the area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy STRAT 9Policy ENV2Policy ENV6Policy E1Policy DM6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

18 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cheshire West and Chester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266013998
    Holly Cottage, Post Office Lane, Norley, WA6 8NB
  2. Dismissed16 October 20266012737
    Smoker Brook Barn, Linnards Lane, Wincham, CW9 6ED
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266011029
    Oaktree, Liverpool Road, Neston, CH64 3RQ
  4. Dismissed10 September 20266005497
    Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB
  5. Dismissed10 September 20266005495
    Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.