Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision16 October 20243348084

35A Rosebury Road, London, SW6 2NQ

described on the application form as “Replacement of all existing single-glazed timber sash and casement windows (front and rear), and single- glazed timber door to the rear elevation with double-glazed uPVC sash and casement windows and double-glazed uPVC door”

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Poole S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area

What decided it

The front windows would introduce an incongruous pane arrangement (6 over 2) in uPVC that would be incompatible with the neighbouring Edwardian terraced houses which retain original timber sash windows with ornate glazing bars, whereas the rear works would not result in harm as they are not visible from the street and replace non-original features.

Plan policies cited: Policy DC1, Policy DC4, Policy DC6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.