Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 February 20253348216

Springfield, Hambrook Hill South, Hambrook, CHICHESTER, PO18 8UJ

erection of 1 no 3-bed dwelling

Authority
Chichester District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Dade E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the integrity of the Chichester and Langstone Harbours Special Protection Area and Ramsar
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the safety and efficiency of the strategic road network and local highways

What decided it

The nutrient neutrality scheme failed to demonstrate adequate mitigation of the proposed development's nutrient impacts on the SPA, meaning the integrity of the SPA would be adversely affected in breach of the Habitats Regulations.

The small positive contribution to housing supply was outweighed by the significant harm to the integrity of the Chichester and Langstone Harbours SPA, which provided a clear reason for refusal under the Habitats Regulations and the Framework's policies protecting areas of particular importance.

Plan policies cited: Policy 49, Policy 50, Policy 33, Policy 45, Policy 48, Policy 8, Policy 9, Policy DS1 of the Chidham and Hambrook Neighbourhood Plan 2016

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.