Planning appeal decision
3 Meadway, Warlingham, Surrey, CR6 9RW
Planning appeal 3348247 at 3 Meadway, Warlingham, Surrey, CR6 9RW (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 24 February 2025 by Inspector De Freitas Terceiro P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO.
a single storey rear extension
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- De Freitas Terceiro P
- Postcode
- CR6 9RW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would be permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO
What decided it
The total enlargement (existing extension plus proposed extension combined) would exceed the width limitation of half the original dwellinghouse width set out in paragraph A.1(j)(iii) of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed26 October 2026601413931a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
- Dismissed15 October 20266005184Streathbourne House, 75 Redehall Road, Smallfield, RH6 9QA
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®