Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 March 20253348316

Former Ats Depot, Edgworth Road, Sudbury, Suffolk , CO10 2TG

Planning appeal 3348316 at Former Ats Depot, Edgworth Road, Sudbury, Suffolk , CO10 2TG (Babergh District Council) was dismissed on 10 March 2025 by Inspector Price J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be acceptable with regard to flood risk.

Redevelopment of existing site to mixed commercial and residential use with Class E business space, 9 new dwellings and alteration of existing vehicular access (existing building to be demolished)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Price J
Postcode
CO10 2TG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be acceptable with regard to flood risk
  • whether the proposal would be acceptable with regard to providing accessible and adaptable residential accommodation
  • whether the proposal would be acceptable with regard to addressing BNG requirements

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate that there are no reasonably available sites appropriate for the proposal with a lower risk of flooding, meaning the sequential test failed and the proposal conflicts with Framework paragraph 174 and JLP Policy LP27.

The substantial benefits of housing delivery, brownfield regeneration and town centre revitalisation were outweighed by the substantial harm from direct conflict with Government flood risk policy and the failure of the sequential test.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SP06LP10LP11LP27LP24SP09LP16
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 170Paragraph 173Paragraph 174Paragraph 175Paragraph 125

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

23 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Babergh District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed7 October 20266011354
    Land at Junction of Friars Street and Church Street, Sudbury, CO10 2AJ
  2. Allowed16 September 20266013583
    57 Vale View Road, Sproughton, Ipswich, IP8 3FS
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266011384
    34 Aldham Road, Hadleigh, IP7 6BP
  4. Allowed7 August 20266007359
    Oaks Farm, Hadleigh Road, Holton St Mary, CO7 6NW
  5. Dismissed5 August 20266005638
    Land East of Capel Road, Bentley, IP9 2DN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.