Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 February 20253348464

27 Wilton Crescent, Wimbledon, London, SW19 3QY

loft Conversion to form second floor and the installation of 2No. of Velux Roof Balcony System to the right side of roof and Two No. Velux window to the left side of roof

Authority
London Borough of Merton
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cowley R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the non-designated heritage asset at 27 Wilton Crescent and the surrounding area, including the John Innes - Wilton Crescent Conservation Area
  • The living conditions of the occupiers of 25 Wilton Crescent, with particular regard to privacy

What decided it

The balcony systems cause both unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the heritage asset and conservation area and undue harm to the privacy of neighbouring occupiers, with insufficient public benefits to outweigh the identified harm.

Framework references: 215, 216

Plan policies cited: Policy HC1 of the London Plan March 2021, Policy D1 of the London Plan, Policy D4 of the London Plan, Policy CS13 of the Core Strategy, Policy CS14 of the Core Strategy, Policy DM D2 of the Sites and Policies Plan, Policy DM D3 of the Sites and Policies Plan, Policy DM D4 of the Sites and Policies Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.