Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 March 20253348661

Creek Cottage, 41 Beach Road, EMSWORTH, PO10 7HR

the demolition of existing dwelling and replacement with sustainable modern dwelling (Use Class C3), incorporating a studio, garaging, solar panels, landscaping and associated works

Authority
Havant Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Redford R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area including the setting of the Chichester Harbour National Landscape
  • The living conditions of the occupants of neighbouring properties with specific regard to outlook

What decided it

The harmful effect on the character and appearance of the area and the setting of the Chichester Harbour National Landscape caused by the proposed flat-roofed design, forward positioning, and bulk, which would overwhelm the established uniformity of pitched-roof properties along the shoreline, outweighed the limited benefits of providing a high specification family home.

The adverse impacts of granting planning permission, particularly harm to character and appearance and the setting of the national landscape, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of providing a high specification family home, and the material considerations did not indicate a decision other than in accordance with the development plan.

Framework references: 11, 189

Plan policies cited: CS11, CS12, CS16, NP Policy D1, NP Policy D2, NP Policy D7, MP Policy 1, MP Policy 2, MP planning principle PP03, MP planning principle PP09

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.