Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 December 20243348794

Grand Prix House, 102-104 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1UF

Planning appeal 3348794 at Grand Prix House, 102-104 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1UF (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 5 December 2024 by Inspector Veevers A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Conservation Area, including the effect of the proposal on the significance of non-designated heritage assets.

‘erection of a new two-storey single family dwelling, including basement and attic accommodation, private amenity space, parking and dedicated bin and bike storage’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Veevers A
Postcode
TW9 1UF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Conservation Area, including the effect of the proposal on the significance of non-designated heritage assets
  • Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to internal ceiling height
  • Whether the proposed development would secure appropriate provision for affordable housing

What decided it

The discordant design of the proposed dwelling, which would be starkly at odds with the form, scale and appearance of adjacent buildings and would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area, combined with the failure to meet London Plan ceiling height standards and the inability to secure the required affordable housing contribution.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP4Policy LP1Policy RP39Policy LP35Policy LP36Policy D6Policy HC1Policy LP3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 48Paragraph 65Paragraph 205Paragraph 209

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

383 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266015879
    88 Colne Road, Twickenham, TW2 6QE
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266015836
    64 First Avenue, Mortlake, London, SW14 8SR
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266011874
    61-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
  4. Dismissed20 October 20266010388
    163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
  5. Dismissed19 October 20266013760
    Pavement Os, 53-57 High Street, Whitton, TW2 7LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.