Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 January 20253349862

52A Queensway, LONDON, W2 3RY

single storey ground floor rear extension; alterations to rear windows; alterations to rear boundaries; rebuilding and alteration of rear closet wing at first and second floor levels (retrospective). New application of London stock brick slips/render to existing elevations; replacement of existing uPVC fenestration with traditional timber framed doors and sash windows; raised parapets with stone copings to accommodate new green roofs to existing extension”

Authority
City of Westminster Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Berry A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including the Queensway Conservation Area and the setting of the Bayswater Conservation Area

What decided it

The first and second floor rear extension causes less than substantial harm to the significance of the Queensway Conservation Area and the setting of the Bayswater Conservation Area by appearing as an incongruous, overly prominent addition that erodes the gap between building blocks, and this harm is not outweighed by the limited public benefits identified.

Framework references: 212, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy 38, Policy 39, Policy 40

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.