Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed2 May 20253350075

Scamps Hill , Lindfield, RH16 2GT

the erection of up to 90 dwellings with public open space, landscaping and sustainable drainage system (SuDS) and vehicular access point. All matters reserved except for means of access

Authority
Mid Sussex District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Longmuir J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on protected species and habitat
  • the effect of the proposal on the settings of the Lindfield Conservation Area, Grade II listed Grayfriars, Grade II listed Tythe Cottage and non-designated heritage asset, Walstead Grange

What decided it

The significant shortfall in housing land supply engaged the paragraph 11(d) tilted balance, and the substantial benefits of housing delivery and affordable housing outweighed the less-than-substantial heritage harm and limited landscape harm identified.

The substantial benefits of 90 new homes, 30% affordable housing, biodiversity net gain and accessible open space outweighed the less-than-substantial harm to heritage assets and limited harm to landscape character, so that adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits under paragraph 11(d).

Framework references: 7, 8, 11, 57, 58, 61, 208, 212, 213, 215, 216

Plan policies cited: DP6, DP12, DP15, DP20, DP25, DP26, DP31, DP34, DP35, DP37, DP38, NP1

Judgments cited: Catesby Estates Ltd v Steer [2018] EWCA Civ 1697; Vistry Homes v Secretary of State for Levelling Up Housing and Communities [2024] EWHC 2088 (Admin); Gladman Developments Limited v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and Corby Borough Council and Uttlesford District Council [2021] EWCA Civ 104

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.