Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 March 20253350275

The Vine PH, Vine Street, Great Bardfield, BRAINTREE, CM7 4SR

‘Single Storey rear extension to main building. Constructed with a steel frame, flat roof with 4no UPVC roof lanterns. Powder coated aluminium folding/sliding doors to rear and side elevation with faux weatherboarding to sides and fascia board.’

Authority
Braintree District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Smith J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the extension on relevant designated and non-designated heritage assets, with particular regard to the external materials

What decided it

The white UPVC roof lanterns with disproportionately substantial frames created an inappropriate and visually intrusive feature that caused less than substantial but material harm to designated heritage assets and a non-designated heritage asset, which was not outweighed by the public benefits of the development.

Framework references: 215, 216

Plan policies cited: Policy SP7 of the Braintree District Local Plan 2013-2033 Section 1, Policy LPP1, Policy LPP47, Policy LPP52, Policy LPP53, Policy LPP57

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.