Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 July 20253350526

Site adj. to Arrow Lea, Eardisland, Leominster, Herefordshire, HR6 9BU

4 No. self-build dwellings with garages

Authority
Herefordshire Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Burston J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area and whether the proposed development would preserve the setting of the Eardisland Conservation Area
  • Whether the site is a suitable location for the development having regard to flood risk
  • The effects of the proposal on the integrity of the River Wye Special Area of Conservation

What decided it

The likely significant adverse effect on the integrity of the River Wye Special Area of Conservation, which engaged paragraph 195 of the Framework and disapplied the presumption in favour of sustainability, combined with significant harm to character and appearance and unacceptable flood risk, meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan with no material considerations of sufficient weight to justify approval.

The benefits of self-build housing delivery and modest economic benefits during construction were outweighed by significant harm to the River Wye SAC, significant harm to character and appearance, less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area setting, and unacceptable flood risk to future residents, resulting in conflict with the development plan as a whole.

Framework references: 135, 213, 195, 11

Plan policies cited: SS6, SD1, LD1, RA2, SD3(2), LD4, SS1, LD2, E1, E3, E9, E1(k), E9(h)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.