Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 February 20253350538

13 Roffes Lane, Chaldon, Caterham, Surrey, CR3 5PU

Planning appeal 3350538 at 13 Roffes Lane, Chaldon, Caterham, Surrey, CR3 5PU (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 12 February 2025 by Inspector Lawrence R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is suitable for residential development in terms of its effect on character and appearance, having regard to its location, the proposed land use, and the amount of development.

the construction of one additional dwelling of 4+ beds on the existing plot

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Lawrence R
Postcode
CR3 5PU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is suitable for residential development in terms of its effect on character and appearance, having regard to its location, the proposed land use, and the amount of development

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to character and appearance caused by piecemeal garden land development with resultant plots smaller than those prevailing in the area, which substantially and demonstrably outweighs the modest housing benefit despite the Council's significant housing land supply shortfall.

The modest housing benefit and economic benefits of a single dwelling were substantially outweighed by the substantial harm to character and appearance, with the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighing the benefits when assessed against the Framework policies as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CSP19 of the Tandridge District Core Strategy 2008Policy DP8 of the Tandridge Local Plan Part 2: Detailed Policies 2014Policy DP7 of the Tandridge Local Plan Part 2: Detailed Policies 2014Policy CSP18 of the Tandridge District Core Strategy 2008Policy CCW4 of the Caterham, Chaldon and Whyteleafe Neighbourhood Plan (2021)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 78

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

147 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed29 October 20266006369
    Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266014139
    31a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
  3. Dismissed15 October 20266005184
    Streathbourne House, 75 Redehall Road, Smallfield, RH6 9QA
  4. Dismissed14 October 20266008351
    Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
  5. Dismissed13 October 20266007518
    Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.