Planning appeal decision
Land on the South and South East Side of Harts Lane, Burghclere, Hampshire, RG20 9JD
Planning appeal 3350581 at Land on the South and South East Side of Harts Lane, Burghclere, Hampshire, RG20 9JD (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was dismissed on 29 April 2025 by Inspector Cragg D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed development having regard to the spatial strategy in the Development Plan.
residential development of 25 dwellings with access on to Harts Lane, with associated open space, infrastructure, drainage, landscaping, and accessible natural greenspace
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Cragg D
- Postcode
- RG20 9JD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed development having regard to the spatial strategy in the Development Plan
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area, combined with conflict with the neighbourhood plan's spatial strategy which attracted paragraph 14 protection, meant the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.
The significant weight given to the package of housing, affordable housing and other benefits was outweighed by the significant harm to landscape character and visual amenity and conflict with the neighbourhood plan's spatial strategy, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SS1Policy SS2Policy SS5Policy SS6Policy EM1Policy EM10Policy CN1Policy CN3Policy CN6Policy CN8Policy SD1Policy B1Policy B2Policy B4Policy B5Policy B8Policy B9Policy B10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 14Paragraph 49Paragraph 58Paragraph 66Paragraph 69Paragraph 70Paragraph 73Paragraph 74Paragraph 80Paragraph 84Paragraph 110Paragraph 115
- Judgments
- Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council vs SoS LUHC and Bewley Homes PLC [2024] EWHC 1916 (Admin) dated 25th July 2024
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed26 October 20266011048Purdues Farm, Mortimer Lane, Fair Oak Green, Stratfield Saye, RG7 2DL
- Allowed26 October 2026600755075 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
- Dismissed20 October 20266011464Old Kiln House, Silchester Road, Tadley, RG263PX
- Dismissed13 October 20266011822Spindles, Winchester Road, Burghclere, RG20 9DX
- Dismissed13 October 20266011099Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, RG26 5DL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®