Planning appeal decision
69 Napsbury Lane, ST. ALBANS, AL1 1DU
detached double garage to front garden with four roof lights to street elevation
- Authority
- St Albans City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- James A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the Framework
- the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that causes harm to openness, and the appellant has failed to demonstrate very special circumstances that would clearly outweigh this substantial harm.
Framework references: 154, 155
Plan policies cited: Policy 1, Policy 13
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®