Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 December 20243350908

69 Napsbury Lane, St. Albans, AL1 1DU

Planning appeal 3350908 at 69 Napsbury Lane, St. Albans, AL1 1DU (St Albans City Council) was dismissed on 31 December 2024 by Inspector James A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the Framework.

detached double garage to front garden with four roof lights to street elevation

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
James A
Postcode
AL1 1DU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the Framework
  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that causes harm to openness, and the appellant has failed to demonstrate very special circumstances that would clearly outweigh this substantial harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 1Policy 13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 155

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

84 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in St Albans City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Planning permission granted15 September 20263311314
    Land at Former Butterfly World, Miriam Lane, St. Albans, Hertfordshire, AL2 3NY
  2. Dismissed10 July 20266008445
    202 Radlett Road, Frogmore, St Albans, AL2 2EN
  3. Planning permission granted8 July 20263374921
    39 The Broadway, Gustard Wood, Wheathampstead, Hertfordshire, AL4 9LW
  4. Notice upheld8 July 20263360007
    39 The Broadway, Wheathampstead, St. Albans, AL4 8LW
  5. Dismissed10 June 20266005367
    Beaumont Hall Lane, Redbourn Road, Redbourn, AL3 6RN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.