Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 December 20243350908

69 Napsbury Lane, ST. ALBANS, AL1 1DU

detached double garage to front garden with four roof lights to street elevation

Authority
St Albans City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
James A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the Framework
  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that causes harm to openness, and the appellant has failed to demonstrate very special circumstances that would clearly outweigh this substantial harm.

Framework references: 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy 1, Policy 13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.