Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 February 20253351197

Rose Cottage, Prees Green, Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 2BN

Planning appeal 3351197 at Rose Cottage, Prees Green, Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 2BN (Shropshire County Council) was dismissed on 6 February 2025 by Inspector Han U, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site was used solely for an agricultural use as part of an established agricultural unit on 20 March 2013, or if the appeal building was not in use on that date, when it was last in use (paragraph Q.1.(a)).

change of use of an existing redundant agricultural building into a one bedroom dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Han U
Postcode
SY13 2BN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site was used solely for an agricultural use as part of an established agricultural unit on 20 March 2013, or if the appeal building was not in use on that date, when it was last in use (paragraph Q.1.(a))
  • whether development under Class A (a) or Class B (a) of Part 6 of the GPDO has been carried out on the established agricultural unit (paragraph Q.1.(g))
  • whether the development would result in the external dimensions of the building extending beyond the external dimensions of the existing building at any given point (Q.1.(h))
  • whether sufficient information has been provided to demonstrate the structural stability of the building or the amount of work required to convert the building to a dwelling (paragraph W(3)(b))

What decided it

The appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the appeal site was used solely for an agricultural use as part of an established agricultural unit on 20 March 2013 or when it was last in use, which is a mandatory requirement under paragraph Q.1.(a) of the GPDO.

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

8 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Shropshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed23 October 20266011367
    4, Beechwood Drive, Shrewsbury, SY1 2RF
  2. Dismissed14 October 20266012541
    1st Floor And 2nd Floor, The Pump House, Coton Hill, Shrewsbury, SY1 2DP
  3. Allowed13 October 20266012744
    Grove Farm, Condover, Shrewsbury, SY5 7BH
  4. Allowed13 October 20266011699
    Grove Farm, Condover, Shrewsbury, SY5 7BH
  5. Dismissed9 October 20266011445
    Land to the East of, 5 The Hem, Shifnal, TF11 9PS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.