Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 February 20253351264

Land North of Duchy Homes, Wynyard, TS22 5UY

Planning appeal 3351264 at Land North of Duchy Homes, Wynyard, TS22 5UY (Hartlepool Borough Council *) was dismissed on 14 February 2025 by Inspector Cullen F, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to the development plan.

erection of 3no. residential plots with associated access (all matters reserved except for access)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cullen F

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to the development plan
  • The effect of the proposed development on the significance of the AEZ, a non-designated heritage asset of archaeological interest

What decided it

The significant weight attached to the proposal's conflict with the development plan's green wedge policies, combined with the inability to rule out unacceptable harm to the archaeological significance of the AEZ, outweighed the benefits of the scheme.

The moderate benefits of housing delivery, self-build provision, economic/social contributions and secured planning obligations were outweighed by the significant weight of harm arising from conflict with the development plan and uncertain harm to the archaeological significance of the non-designated heritage asset.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy NE3Policy HSG6Policy HE1Policy HE2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 209Paragraph 216Paragraph 218

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

1 other decided appeal within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Hartlepool

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed27 November 20253368455
    Land at Whelly Hill Farm, Worset Lane, Hartlepool, TS27 3BH
  2. Dismissed8 December 20233323428
    Low Throston House, The Bungalow, Netherby Gate, Hartlepool, TS26 0LF
  3. Dismissed12 December 20223300990
    Vacant Land on Fens Lane, Hart, TS27 3BT
  4. Dismissed17 September 20266008410
    14 Elm Grove, Hartlepool, TS26 8LZ
  5. Allowed28 August 20266011212
    58 Ryehill Gardens, Hartlepool, TS26 0JJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.