Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 February 20253351313

The Oast House, Pikes Lane, Crowhurst, Lingfield, Surrey, RH7 6LX

Planning appeal 3351313 at The Oast House, Pikes Lane, Crowhurst, Lingfield, Surrey, RH7 6LX (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 24 February 2025 by Inspector Miles H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 and any relevant development plan policies.

new gated access and hardstanding area for sewage tankers to empty treatment tank and also to allow entry of large agricultural machinery to the fields

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector
Miles H
Postcode
RH7 6LX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposed development on highway safety
  • The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal fails to preserve the openness of the Green Belt and constitutes inappropriate development, with additional substantial harms to character and appearance, highway safety, and biodiversity that are not clearly outweighed by the limited private benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DP10CSP18CSP21DP7DP5CSP12CSP17DP19
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed29 October 20266006369
    Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
  2. Dismissed14 October 20266008351
    Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266007518
    Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
  4. Dismissed23 September 20266008688
    Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
  5. Dismissed22 September 20266011736
    Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.