Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 May 20253351389

27 Hackney Grove, London, E8 3NR

Planning appeal 3351389 at 27 Hackney Grove, London, E8 3NR (London Borough of Hackney) was dismissed on 8 May 2025 by Inspector Redford R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building known as '25 and 27, Hackney Grove E8' and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it has.

the change of use from offices to mixed residential/commercial with 3x 1-bed/1person self contained flats and 1x office space at the lower ground floor, side infill extension and 1st and 2nd floors, demolition of additions at the rear, window change to rear, front railing refurbishment and restauration, bike storage, waste storage, planter extension to front garden, new paving to the front, new cast iron stairs to rear garden from upper ground floors level, internal alterations

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Redford R
Postcode
E8 3NR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building known as '25 and 27, Hackney Grove E8' and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it has
  • whether the proposal would preserve the setting of the nearby Grade II listed building, known as 'Forecourt wall to number 25' and preserve or enhance the character or appearance of Mare Street Conservation Area
  • whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers with specific regard to internal space
  • whether the proposal would provide sufficient affordable housing
  • the effect of the proposal on transport infrastructure with regard to car parking
  • the effect of the proposal on climate change

What decided it

The harm to three heritage assets (the listed building, its setting, and the conservation area) would not be outweighed by the public benefits of bringing a vacant building back into use and creating housing, particularly given the irrevocable damage to historic fabric and context.

The considerable weight given to bringing a vacant at-risk building back into use and creating housing in a sustainable location was outweighed by the great weight that must be attached to the less than substantial harm caused to three heritage assets, the failure to provide adequate living conditions for future occupants, insufficient affordable housing provision, and potential harm to transport infrastructure.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy D4London Plan Policy D6London Plan Policy H4London Plan Policy H5London Plan Policy T1London Plan Policy T4London Plan Policy SI2Hackney Local Plan Policy LP1Hackney Local Plan Policy LP2Hackney Local Plan Policy LP3Hackney Local Plan Policy LP4Hackney Local Plan Policy LP12Hackney Local Plan Policy LP13Hackney Local Plan Policy LP17Hackney Local Plan Policy LP43Hackney Local Plan Policy LP55
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 65Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

781 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hackney

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266010033
    259 Wick Road, Hackney, London, E9 5DG
  2. Allowed11 August 20266010297
    Flat A 141 Amhurst Road, London, E8 2AW
  3. Dismissed7 July 20266004208
    El Manti, 10 - 12 Andre Street,, Hackney, London,, E8 2AA
  4. Allowed8 June 20266009364
    19 St Andrews Grove, London, N16 5NF
  5. Dismissed19 May 20266004031
    9 Clifden Road, Hackney, London,, E5 0LL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.