Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 December 20243351577

3 Collard Place, LONDON, NW1 8DU

the installation of 2x AC units

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Householder developments
Inspector
Wyborn D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the AC units on the living conditions of adjoining occupants
  • whether or not the proposal has justified the need for active cooling, having regard to the approach of the development plan and the cooling hierarchy

What decided it

The unacceptable adverse impact by way of noise on the living conditions of adjoining occupants, which cannot be overcome by planning conditions, outweighs the justified need for active cooling.

Plan policies cited: Policy A1, Policy A4, Policy CC1, Policy CC2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.