Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 February 20253351647

Land to the West of the A689, Howden-le-Wear , DL15 8EP

Planning appeal 3351647 at Land to the West of the A689, Howden-le-Wear , DL15 8EP (Durham County Council) was dismissed on 21 February 2025 by Inspector Clark L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to development plan policy.

erection of a stable block with 3 No. stables (personal use) and new vehicular access onto the A689 highway

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector
Clark L
Postcode
DL15 8EP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to development plan policy
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the open countryside including the Area of Higher Landscape Value (AHLV)
  • the effect of the proposed access arrangement on highway safety with regard to visibility splays at the junction with the A689

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan on three grounds—unsuitable location outside a farmstead, cumulative harm to countryside character and landscape value, and inability to achieve safe and suitable access with adequate visibility—and material considerations do not indicate the appeal should be decided otherwise.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 10Policy 13Policy 21Policy 29Policy 39
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12Paragraph 15Paragraph 116

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

3 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Durham County Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266007418
    Land to the West of St Michael's Rise, Hawthorn, SR7 8BY
  2. Allowed25 September 20266003865
    The Boathouse Inn, Elvet Bridge, Durham, DH1 3AF
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266005969
    3 Roosevelt Road, Durham, DH1 1PS
  4. Dismissed16 September 20266004850
    119 Bradford Crescent, Durham, DH1 1HW
  5. Dismissed16 September 20266004494
    49 Annand Road, Durham, DH1 1PW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.