Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld3 June 20263351654

37 Foxglove End, LEISTON, Suffolk, IP16 4UT

Without planning permission an artificial hedge and supporting structure which is over 2.5m in height attached to the existing outbuilding (shown in blue on the attached plan) contrary to Schedule 2, Part 2, Class E.1 (e) (ii) of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended)

Authority
East Suffolk
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Goldberg V

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the artificial hedge and supporting structure constitute development requiring planning permission or benefit from permitted development rights under the GPDO
  • Whether the steps required by the enforcement notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control

What decided it

The artificial hedge and supporting structure exceed the 2.5 metre height limit applicable to development within 2 metres of the curtilage boundary and therefore do not constitute permitted development.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.