Planning appeal decision
Murreys Court, 10 Agates Lane, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 2NF
Planning appeal 3351839 at Murreys Court, 10 Agates Lane, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 2NF (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 21 May 2025 by Inspector Chamberlain G, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including trees.
‘Application seeking Phased Full Planning Permission for the Retention and refurbishment of Grade II Listed Barn for resident’s lounge/estate office, demolition of principal building and cottage, and partial demolition and redevelopment of existing stable complex. Construction of new buildings comprising assisted living units (Class C2) and a care home (Class C2) with new landscaping and tree planting, new public pedestrian access between The Murreys and Agates Lane, and use of existing bellmouth on The Murreys for vehicular access’
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Chamberlain G
- Postcode
- KT21 2NF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including trees
- The effect of the proposal on the significance of The Barn, a Grade II listed building
- The effect of the proposed development on the significance of non-designated heritage assets
- The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity, with particular reference to the traditional orchard, a Habitat of Principal Importance
What decided it
The cumulative harm to the character and appearance of the area and to non-designated heritage assets (particularly the demolition of Murreys Court) outweighed the otherwise weighty benefits of the scheme.
The benefits of the scheme, though weighty (housing for older people, affordable housing, heritage benefits to The Barn), outweighed the less than substantial harm to the listed Barn but did not outweigh the totality of harm to character/appearance, non-designated heritage assets and biodiversity, tipping the balance against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DS3Policy EN4Policy EN9Policy AS-H5Policy ASEn2Policy ASEn3Policy EN6Policy H6Policy EN5(6)Policy S1Policy DS1Policy DS2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 210Paragraph 192Paragraph 193
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 October 20266010634The Garden House, School Lane, Mickleham, Dorking, RH5 6EW
- Dismissed27 October 202660036941 Ivy House Cottages, Partridge Lane, Newdigate, RH5 5BU
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 October 20266010203High Bank,, Mill Hill Lane, Betchworth, RH3 7LS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®