Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 August 20253351880

Land at Mahollam Road, Huntington, Kington, Herefordshire, HR5 3PU

Planning appeal 3351880 at Land at Mahollam Road, Huntington, Kington, Herefordshire, HR5 3PU (Herefordshire Council) was dismissed on 21 August 2025 by Inspector Phillips A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect on the character and appearance of the area (Appeal A).

the erection of polytunnels and associated infrastructure essential for blueberry and cherry production. Appeal B: APP/W1850/W/24/3351880 Land at Mahollam Road, Huntington, Kington HR5 3PU

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
agricultural · Change of use
Inspector
Phillips A
Postcode
HR5 3PU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area (Appeal A)
  • The effect on the setting of the nearby Huntington Castle (Scheduled Monument and Grade II listed building) and Turret Castle (Scheduled Monument) (Appeal A)
  • Whether it has been adequately demonstrated that the effect of the development on the integrity River Lugg/River Wyre Special Area of Conservation has been assessed and mitigated to avoid any adverse impact (Appeal A)
  • Whether it has been adequately demonstrated that the effect of the development on the integrity River Lugg/River Wyre Special Area of Conservation has been assessed and mitigated to avoid any adverse impact, including whether it has been adequately demonstrated that the development would not lead to an unacceptable risk of foul water flooding and pollution to the local environment (Appeal B)
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area with particular reference to perceptual qualities of quietude and visual effects (Appeal B)
  • The effect on the setting of the nearby Turret Castle (Scheduled Monument) (Appeal B)

What decided it

The combination of harm to landscape character, less than substantial harm to the settings of the scheduled monuments, and the failure to demonstrate with legal and scientific certainty that the developments would not adversely affect the integrity of the River Lugg/River Wye SAC, outweighed the generalised public benefits put forward.

the less than substantial harm to the settings of Huntington Castle and Turret Castle, together with harm to landscape character and unresolved uncertainty over SAC nutrient neutrality, was not outweighed by the generalised economic benefits of the polytunnel and caravan schemes

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LD1Policy RA6Policy RA4Policy SS6Policy LD4Policy LD2Policy SD4Policy SD1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 187Paragraph 206
Judgments
Steer v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Catesby Estates Limited, Amber Valley Borough Council [2018] EWCA Civ 1697; Landelijke Vereniging tot Behoud van de Waddenzee v Staatssecretaris, 7 September 2004, C-127/02

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

2 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Herefordshire Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed26 May 20266003942
    Old Sun Valley Poultry Site, Off Birch View Road, Much Dewchurch, Herefordshire, HR2 8SH
  2. Dismissed17 April 20266003208
    46 Seaton Avenue, Hereford, HR1 1NR
  3. Dismissed10 March 20266000513
    Agricultural Land at Tillington Fruit Farm,, Tillington Farm,, Burghill, Herefordshire, HR4 7RW
  4. Allowed4 March 20266002040
    Land South of Symonds Yat View, Great Doward Avenue, Whitchurch, Ross on Wye, Herefordshire, HR9 6FP
  5. Dismissed18 December 20256000612
    Weggs Stud, Herefordshire, HR3 6NY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.