Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 February 20253351971

29 Lonsdale Road, London, SW13 9JP

described on the application form as “Rear roof extension in line with the extents of the existing rear extension with one new dormer window to rear. Two new conservation style pitched rooflights to front elevation. Two new conservation style pitched rooflights to side elevations, one per side. One new flat roof light in new portion of flat roo f

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Poole S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building
  • Whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Castelnau Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposal would create an overly dominant roof form that harms the character and appearance of the host building and the conservation area, with no public benefits to justify the less than substantial harm to the heritage asset.

Framework references: 215

Plan policies cited: Policy LP1, Policy LP3, Policy LP4, Policy 28, Policy 29, Policy 30

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.