Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 February 20253352055

22 Maryside, SLOUGH, SL3 7ET

the erection of a part rear infill ground-floor extension, part rear first- floor extension

Authority
Slough Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Allan J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the host dwelling and wider area
  • Highway safety and free flow of traffic with regard to parking provision
  • The living conditions at the appeal property with regard to amenity space provision

What decided it

The proposal would be harmful to the character and appearance of the dwelling and wider area, and would provide inadequate amenity space for the increased residential capacity, both contrary to the SPD and development plan policies.

Plan policies cited: Core Policy 8, Core Policy 7, Policy H15, Policy EN1, Policy EN2, Policy H14, Policy T2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.