Planning appeal decision
Land to the South of H/1:B and to the East of H/1:C, Babraham Road, Sawston Cambridge, CB22 3DQ
Planning appeal 3352058 at Land to the South of H/1:B and to the East of H/1:C, Babraham Road, Sawston Cambridge, CB22 3DQ (South Cambridgeshire District Council) was dismissed on 6 June 2025 by Inspector Pattison B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the erection of up to 9 self-build or custom-build units, up to 15 community allotments, a new permissive right of way and potential community orchard
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Pattison B
- Postcode
- CB22 3DQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the appeal site is in an acceptable location having regard to local and national policies
- the effect of the proposal on the best and most versatile agricultural land
- if it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances needed to justify the development
What decided it
The absence of a mechanism to secure the self-build units as affordable housing in perpetuity, combined with the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness of the development, means the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal do not exist.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy and loss of best and most versatile agricultural land, outweighs the benefits of housing supply, self-build provision, economic benefits and community facilities, particularly given the lack of a secured mechanism for affordable housing delivery.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S/4Policy S/6Policy S/7Policy S/2Policy H/11Policy NH/3Policy HQ/1Policy NH/2Policy S/3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 73Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 180Paragraph 188
- Judgments
- Julian Wood v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWHC Civ 195; Mead Realisations Ltd v The Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities & Anor [2024] EWHC 279 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Cambridgeshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed23 October 20266005101Land North of Pampisford Road, Great Abington, Cambridge, CB21 6AH
- Dismissed19 October 20266010417Land to Rear of No.9 Brewery Lane, Meldreth, Royston, SG8 6NS
- Dismissed19 October 2026600863119 Church Street, Steeple Morden, SG8 0NJ
- Dismissed16 October 20266011793Land to the Rear of Queen Adelaide PH, High Street, Croydon, SG8 0DT
- Dismissed2 October 20266011365Land Adjacent to North Grove, Long Lane, Fowlmere, SG8 7TG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®