Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 June 20253352058

Land to the South of H/1:B and to the East of H/1:C, Babraham Road, Sawston Cambridge, CB22 3DQ

Planning appeal 3352058 at Land to the South of H/1:B and to the East of H/1:C, Babraham Road, Sawston Cambridge, CB22 3DQ (South Cambridgeshire District Council) was dismissed on 6 June 2025 by Inspector Pattison B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

the erection of up to 9 self-build or custom-build units, up to 15 community allotments, a new permissive right of way and potential community orchard

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pattison B
Postcode
CB22 3DQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether the appeal site is in an acceptable location having regard to local and national policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the best and most versatile agricultural land
  • if it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances needed to justify the development

What decided it

The absence of a mechanism to secure the self-build units as affordable housing in perpetuity, combined with the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness of the development, means the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal do not exist.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy and loss of best and most versatile agricultural land, outweighs the benefits of housing supply, self-build provision, economic benefits and community facilities, particularly given the lack of a secured mechanism for affordable housing delivery.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy S/4Policy S/6Policy S/7Policy S/2Policy H/11Policy NH/3Policy HQ/1Policy NH/2Policy S/3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 73Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 180Paragraph 188
Judgments
Julian Wood v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWHC Civ 195; Mead Realisations Ltd v The Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities & Anor [2024] EWHC 279 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

26 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Cambridgeshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed23 October 20266005101
    Land North of Pampisford Road, Great Abington, Cambridge, CB21 6AH
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266010417
    Land to Rear of No.9 Brewery Lane, Meldreth, Royston, SG8 6NS
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266008631
    19 Church Street, Steeple Morden, SG8 0NJ
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266011793
    Land to the Rear of Queen Adelaide PH, High Street, Croydon, SG8 0DT
  5. Dismissed2 October 20266011365
    Land Adjacent to North Grove, Long Lane, Fowlmere, SG8 7TG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.