Planning appeal decision
20 Westfield Drive, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3QL
Planning appeal 3352125 at 20 Westfield Drive, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3QL (Charnwood Borough Council) was dismissed on 13 March 2025 by Inspector Han U, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area.
removal of existing dwelling and erection of 6 x 2 bed flats and 2 x 2 bed dwellings with access and landscaping
- Authority
- Charnwood Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Han U
- Postcode
- LE11 3QL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of 18 Westfield Drive with regard to light and outlook and 22 Westfield Drive with regard to privacy and outlook, and 182 Ashby Road and Hickling Court with regard to privacy
- whether adequate living conditions would be provided for the future occupiers of the proposed development with particular regard to outdoor amenity space, light and outlook
- whether sufficient information has been provided to demonstrate that the proposed development would not adversely affect protected species
- whether sufficient information has been provided to demonstrate that there would be a net gain in biodiversity having particular regard to the development plan
What decided it
The significant collective harms to character and appearance, neighbouring living conditions, and failure to demonstrate biodiversity net gain outweighed the modest benefits of housing delivery, as the proposal conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole.
The modest benefits of housing delivery and use of a windfall site within the settlement, carrying moderate cumulative weight, were outweighed by the significant collective harms to character and appearance, living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, and failure to demonstrate biodiversity net gain, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS2Policy CS13Policy EV/1Policy DS5Policy EV6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 49Paragraph 11Paragraph 71
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Charnwood
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed5 October 2026600943334 - 36 Station Road, Rearsby, LE7 4YY
- Allowed29 September 20266010437Simtec Materials Handling, Unit 116, The Burrows, East Goscote, LE7 3XD
- Allowed28 September 20266006703Former Rear Gardens to 77 Frederick Street, 2,4,6,8,10,12,14 Arthur Street, Loughborough, LE11 3AY
- Dismissed26 August 202660091601034 Melton Road, Syston, LE7 2NN
- Allowed17 August 2026600829019 Loughborough Road, Burton On The Wolds, LE12 5AF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®