Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 April 20253352271

The Limes Holme Street, Tarvin, Chester, CH3 8EQ

Planning appeal 3352271 at The Limes Holme Street, Tarvin, Chester, CH3 8EQ (Cheshire West and Chester) was dismissed on 15 April 2025 by Inspector Hobbs J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the effect on a non-designated heritage asset and trees.

Full Planning application seeking the demolition of the existing buildings on site and the erection of 8 detached dwellings, with garages at The Limes, Holme Street

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hobbs J
Postcode
CH3 8EQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the effect on a non-designated heritage asset and trees
  • whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for new residential development, with particular reference to the spatial strategy and accessibility of amenities and facilities
  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • whether the proposal would provide appropriate living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to the provision of external amenity space
  • the effect of the proposal on protected species
  • whether the proposal makes an appropriate contribution toward affordable housing provision
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of The Limes Cottage, with particular regard to privacy
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would cause substantial harm to the Green Belt, character and appearance, heritage assets, and living conditions which would not be outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing supply and site redevelopment.

The substantial harm arising from inappropriateness in the Green Belt, loss of non-designated heritage asset, harm to character and appearance, inadequate external amenity space, unsustainable location, and lack of affordable housing was not outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing supply and site redevelopment, and did not amount to very special circumstances.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy STRAT1Policy STRAT2Policy STRAT9Policy ENV3Policy ENV4Policy ENV5Policy ENV6Policy SOC1Policy SOC5Policy DM2Policy DM3Policy DM19Policy DM21Policy DM44Policy DM45Policy DM48Policy HG3 of the Tarvin Neighbourhood Development Plan 2018-2030
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 61Paragraph 73Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 125Paragraph 135Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 216

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

8 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cheshire West and Chester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266013998
    Holly Cottage, Post Office Lane, Norley, WA6 8NB
  2. Dismissed16 October 20266012737
    Smoker Brook Barn, Linnards Lane, Wincham, CW9 6ED
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266011029
    Oaktree, Liverpool Road, Neston, CH64 3RQ
  4. Dismissed10 September 20266005497
    Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB
  5. Dismissed10 September 20266005495
    Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.