Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed4 April 20253352491

Little Canon , 229 Canon Lane, Wateringbury , Kent, ME18 5PJ

erection of garden storage shed/tractor mower store

Authority
Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Dyer I

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies, including any relevant effects on the openness of the Green Belt and whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The site qualifies as previously developed land under paragraph 154g) of the Framework, and the proposal would not cause substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt, therefore it is not inappropriate development.

Framework references: 145, 154

Plan policies cited: CP3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.