Planning appeal decision
Land at Spencer's Farm, Stockbridge Road, King's Somborne, SO20 6NZ
Planning appeal 3352671 at Land at Spencer's Farm, Stockbridge Road, King's Somborne, SO20 6NZ (Test Valley Borough Council) was dismissed on 25 September 2025 by Inspector Thandi B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is an appropriate location for new housing having regard to development plan policies.
the erection of 14 dwellings and garages, access road, drainage and landscaping. (10 to be custom build houses and 4 to be first homes)
- Authority
- Test Valley Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Thandi B
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the site is an appropriate location for new housing having regard to development plan policies
- Whether the proposal would be acceptable in terms of layout and housing mix
- Whether or not the proposed development would make appropriate provision for affordable housing
- The effect upon trees
- Whether the public open space contribution is required to make the proposal acceptable in planning terms
- The effect of the proposal upon the Solent and Southampton Water and New Forest Special Protection Area European protected sites
What decided it
The harm arising from the suburban layout and housing mix that fails to reflect local need, combined with the inability to mitigate likely significant effects on the Solent and Southampton Water and New Forest Special Protection Area, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits of housing delivery and custom building.
Although the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) of the NPPF would normally apply due to the Council's shortfall in five-year housing land supply, paragraph 195 of the NPPF prevents its application because the proposal is likely to have a significant effect on a habitats site without an appropriate assessment concluding no adverse effect on integrity. Even if the tilted balance applied, the harm from the layout, housing mix and affordable housing provision would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy COM2Policy KS/ALL1Policy KS/H2Policy COM7Policy E2Policy LHW1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 78Paragraph 11Paragraph 195
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin); Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [JPL, 1982, P37]
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Test Valley
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed6 July 20266004535Larch Gables, Old Stockbridge Road, Middle Wallop, Stockbridge, SO20 8DZ
- Dismissed29 June 20266006347Home Spring, Houghton Road, North Houghton, Stockbridge, SO20 6LF
- Allowed25 June 20266006170Land West of Sandhill Farm, Salisbury Road, Sherfield English, SO51 6FL
- Dismissed1 May 20266004223Appledore, The Drive, East Wellow, Romsey, SO51 6BN
- Dismissed23 October 20253367177Mornington , North Lane, West Tytherley, Hampshire, SP5 1LX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®