Planning appeal decision
White Lodge Cottage Holloway Hill, Lyne, Chertsey, KT16 0AE
Planning appeal 3352763 at White Lodge Cottage Holloway Hill, Lyne, Chertsey, KT16 0AE (Runnymede Borough Council) was dismissed on 17 June 2025 by Inspector Sylvester G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would affect the integrity of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area.
the demolition of existing dwelling and development of seven dwellings with associated car parking, access and landscaping
- Authority
- Runnymede Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Sylvester G
- Postcode
- KT16 0AE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would affect the integrity of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area
- Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the Framework, and its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- Whether the proposed development would be in a sustainable location having particular regard to the accessibility of services and facilities, and Framework paragraphs 110 and 115
What decided it
The proposed development would have a significant adverse effect on the integrity of the Thames Basin Heaths SPA and the appellant failed to secure legally sound and effective mitigation measures through planning obligations, as required by Policy EE10 and Framework Paragraphs 187 and 193.
The benefits of housing delivery and the absence of other harms were outweighed by the significant adverse effect on the SPA integrity, which is a determinative matter that brings the development into conflict with the development plan as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EE10Policy EE17Policy SD7Policy SD8Policy EE9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 187Paragraph 193Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- Julian Wood v SSCLG & Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Runnymede Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed29 October 20266006748St Merryns Copse, Chobham Road, Ottershaw, KT16 0QE
- Dismissed12 October 20266006766Land to the West of, 203 - 221 New Haw Road, Addlestone, KT15 2DP
- Dismissed17 August 20266008286203 Almners Road, Lyne, KT16 0BL
- Allowed11 August 20266006147Tamar, Hurst Lane, Egham, TW20 8QJ
- Dismissed21 July 202660061992 Pine Close, New Haw, Addlestone, KT15 3BW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®