Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 March 20253352794

Poplars Hotel, Cotswold Road, WARRINGTON, WA2 9SG

demolition of existing public house. Construction of 14 dwellings with new access and car parking

Authority
Warrington Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Taylor K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal makes adequate provision for any additional need for affordable housing and other necessary infrastructure contributions arising from the development
  • Whether the proposal provides a suitable mix of housing, including the provision of accessible and adaptable dwellings
  • Whether the proposal provides adequate justification for the loss of the public house
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of Lancing Avenue, with particular reference to outlook
  • Whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with regard to outlook and private amenity space
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety, having regard to servicing arrangements
  • The effect of the proposal on Biodiversity
  • Whether the proposal would provide adequate provision for sustainable drainage, having regard to the surface water drainage hierarchy
  • Whether the proposal would provide adequate provision for the reduction in carbon emissions

What decided it

The cumulative conflict with multiple development plan policies - covering affordable housing/viability, housing mix, loss of the public house, character and appearance, living conditions for future occupants, highway safety, biodiversity net gain and drainage - outweighed the benefits of brownfield housing delivery.

The benefits of delivering 14 dwellings on previously developed land, including substantial weight for brownfield use and some social/economic benefits, were not sufficient to outweigh the harm and conflict with development plan and national policy arising from the viability/affordable housing shortfall, unsuitable housing mix, unjustified loss of the public house, harm to character and appearance, and unacceptable living conditions for future occupiers.

Framework references: 59, 182

Plan policies cited: Policy DEV2, Policy INF4, Policy INF5, Policy DEV5, Policy DC6, Policy DC4, Policy DC3, Policy ENV2, Policy ENV7, Policy INF1, Policy ENV8

Judgments cited: Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.