Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 March 20253352794

Poplars Hotel, Cotswold Road, Warrington, WA2 9SG

Planning appeal 3352794 at Poplars Hotel, Cotswold Road, Warrington, WA2 9SG (Warrington Borough Council) was dismissed on 13 March 2025 by Inspector Taylor K, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal makes adequate provision for any additional need for affordable housing and other necessary infrastructure contributions arising from the development.

demolition of existing public house. Construction of 14 dwellings with new access and car parking

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Taylor K
Postcode
WA2 9SG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal makes adequate provision for any additional need for affordable housing and other necessary infrastructure contributions arising from the development
  • Whether the proposal provides a suitable mix of housing, including the provision of accessible and adaptable dwellings
  • Whether the proposal provides adequate justification for the loss of the public house
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of Lancing Avenue, with particular reference to outlook
  • Whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with regard to outlook and private amenity space
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety, having regard to servicing arrangements
  • The effect of the proposal on Biodiversity
  • Whether the proposal would provide adequate provision for sustainable drainage, having regard to the surface water drainage hierarchy
  • Whether the proposal would provide adequate provision for the reduction in carbon emissions

What decided it

The cumulative conflict with multiple development plan policies - covering affordable housing/viability, housing mix, loss of the public house, character and appearance, living conditions for future occupants, highway safety, biodiversity net gain and drainage - outweighed the benefits of brownfield housing delivery.

The benefits of delivering 14 dwellings on previously developed land, including substantial weight for brownfield use and some social/economic benefits, were not sufficient to outweigh the harm and conflict with development plan and national policy arising from the viability/affordable housing shortfall, unsuitable housing mix, unjustified loss of the public house, harm to character and appearance, and unacceptable living conditions for future occupiers.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DEV2Policy INF4Policy INF5Policy DEV5Policy DC6Policy DC4Policy DC3Policy ENV2Policy ENV7Policy INF1Policy ENV8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 59Paragraph 182
Judgments
Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

27 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Warrington Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed26 October 20266008814
    Land at Fowl Farm, Off Mowcroft Lane,, Cuerdley, Warrington, WA5 2XQ
  2. Dismissed1 September 20253366420
    Land at 107 Sankey Street, Bewsey And Whitecross, Warrington, WA1 1NW
  3. Allowed25 June 20253355164
    Land at Junction of Grappenhall Lane/Barleycastle Lane, Warrington, WA4 4QT
  4. Dismissed22 May 20253352761
    Vacant Land to the South of Delph Lane, Warrington, WA2 0RE
  5. Allowed16 April 20253350472
    Walnut Tree Farm, Northwich Road, Warrington, WA4 4PG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.