Planning appeal decision
Woodford, Old Lane, Ightham, Sevenoaks, Kent, TN15 9AH
Planning appeal 3352986 at Woodford, Old Lane, Ightham, Sevenoaks, Kent, TN15 9AH (Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council) was allowed on 26 February 2025 by Inspector Dade E, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
change of use of land to use as a residential caravan site for 5 gypsy/traveller households, including the stationing of 8 caravans for residential purposes of which no more than 5 shall be static caravans/mobile homes, together with extension of existing hardstanding
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Dade E
- Postcode
- TN15 9AH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on highway safety
- Whether other material considerations, including the need for and supply of pitches, outweighs any harm identified such as to justify the development
What decided it
The significant weight given to the acute shortfall in gypsy and traveller pitch supply and the best interests of the resident children outweighed the limited harm identified to highway safety.
the small adverse impact on highway safety was outweighed by other material considerations, including the significant weight afforded to the shortfall in pitch supply and the best interests of the children, so the presumption in favour of sustainable development pointed towards granting permission
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP3Policy CP20Policy SQ8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 232Paragraph 11Paragraph 84Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 129Paragraph 135Paragraph 139Paragraph 55
- Judgments
- Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham CC [1961] AC 636; Shortt v SSCLG [2015] EWCA Civ 1192
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tonbridge and Malling
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed8 July 20266007841Land Adjoining Hazeldene, Pilgrims Way, Trottiscliffe, West Malling, ME19 5EW
- Dismissed18 June 20266004481Elpatos, Pilgrims Way, West Malling, ME19 5EP
- Dismissed24 March 20263374700Trench Farmhouse, Coldharbour Lane, Hildenborough, Tonbridge, TN11 9LE
- Dismissed3 March 20266002415The Lodge, 2 Yaldham Manor Drive, Sevenoaks, Kent, TN15 6FA
- Dismissed11 February 20266001182440 Land and Building East of Rose Cottage, Lunsford Lane, Aylesford, Kent, ME20 6JA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®