Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed26 February 20253352986

Woodford, Old Lane, Ightham, Sevenoaks, Kent, TN15 9AH

Planning appeal 3352986 at Woodford, Old Lane, Ightham, Sevenoaks, Kent, TN15 9AH (Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council) was allowed on 26 February 2025 by Inspector Dade E, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

change of use of land to use as a residential caravan site for 5 gypsy/traveller households, including the stationing of 8 caravans for residential purposes of which no more than 5 shall be static caravans/mobile homes, together with extension of existing hardstanding

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Dade E
Postcode
TN15 9AH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • Whether other material considerations, including the need for and supply of pitches, outweighs any harm identified such as to justify the development

What decided it

The significant weight given to the acute shortfall in gypsy and traveller pitch supply and the best interests of the resident children outweighed the limited harm identified to highway safety.

the small adverse impact on highway safety was outweighed by other material considerations, including the significant weight afforded to the shortfall in pitch supply and the best interests of the children, so the presumption in favour of sustainable development pointed towards granting permission

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP3Policy CP20Policy SQ8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 142Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 232Paragraph 11Paragraph 84Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 129Paragraph 135Paragraph 139Paragraph 55
Judgments
Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham CC [1961] AC 636; Shortt v SSCLG [2015] EWCA Civ 1192

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

31 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tonbridge and Malling

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed8 July 20266007841
    Land Adjoining Hazeldene, Pilgrims Way, Trottiscliffe, West Malling, ME19 5EW
  2. Dismissed18 June 20266004481
    Elpatos, Pilgrims Way, West Malling, ME19 5EP
  3. Dismissed24 March 20263374700
    Trench Farmhouse, Coldharbour Lane, Hildenborough, Tonbridge, TN11 9LE
  4. Dismissed3 March 20266002415
    The Lodge, 2 Yaldham Manor Drive, Sevenoaks, Kent, TN15 6FA
  5. Dismissed11 February 20266001182
    440 Land and Building East of Rose Cottage, Lunsford Lane, Aylesford, Kent, ME20 6JA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.