Planning appeal decision
Land to the South of Peewit Hill, Bursledon, Hampshire, SO31 8BL
Planning appeal 3353080 at Land to the South of Peewit Hill, Bursledon, Hampshire, SO31 8BL (Eastleigh Borough Council) was dismissed on 4 June 2025 by Inspector Plenty B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed dwellings would affect the integrity of the Solent and Southampton Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site and the Solent Maritime Special Area of Conservation (SAC) (collectively known as the Solent Complex), as well as the New Forest SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites.
the Erection of 2no. semi-detached 3-bed dwellings, with associated access, parking and landscaping
- Authority
- Eastleigh Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Plenty B
- Postcode
- SO31 8BL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed dwellings would affect the integrity of the Solent and Southampton Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site and the Solent Maritime Special Area of Conservation (SAC) (collectively known as the Solent Complex), as well as the New Forest SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites
- Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location, with regard to local policies, and in consideration of the effect on the character and appearance of the site and its surroundings
- Whether the proposal would make a suitable provision towards Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG)
What decided it
The proposal would lead to adverse effects on the integrity of the New Forest SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites, which provides a strong reason to refuse the development despite the Council's five-year housing land supply shortfall.
The modest housing contribution and economic benefits, together with compliance with character and appearance policies, were outweighed by the conflict with LP policy DM11 regarding European site integrity, which provides a strong reason for refusal under NPPF paragraph 11(d) notwithstanding the reduced weight given to locational policy conflicts due to the five-year supply shortfall.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S5Policy S6Policy DM1Policy DM11
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 193Paragraph 194
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Eastleigh
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed28 October 202660157674 Barfoot Road, Hedge End, Southampton, SO30 2LL
- Dismissed26 October 20266005642Land at Denham's Corner, Horton Heath, Eastleigh, SO32 2BW
- Dismissed12 October 2026601132827 Moore Crescent, Netley, Southampton, So315by
- Dismissed8 October 20266008044Quob Store Bungalow, Allington Lane, West End, SO30 3HQ
- Dismissed31 July 202660076611 Oakmount Avenue, Chandlers Ford, Southampton, SO533AB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®